Archive for the WWW Category

Adding Dynamic Sets to Flickr.com

Posted in WWW, Web Tech on December 13, 2007 by ionclad

Wouldn’t it be nice to have a set that updates every day and contains all images with the tags “kid” and “school”? There is a way. In fact one can create sorted sets based on many criteria. Random, most interesting, least interesting, newest, oldest are a few of the ways one can sort the sets. These parameters are updated to your flickr.com sets every day (if you choose) or you can create a ‘one-off’ set that stays the way it is.

You need go to an external site for this, but once you authorize with flickr.com your good to go. You create the sets at the website and the website creates the set for you on flickr.com. They are very easy to use and create.

The power lies once you have your sets created using tags. They update every day, or you can manually update them from the site (see below). Now all you have to do is upload your images to flickr.com and ensure they all have appropriate tags. For example all of my black and white work is tagged “B&W” and then “film” or “digital”. One dynamic set is built with all images containing both “B&W” and “film” and another with images tagged “B&W” and “digital”. When I upload and tag my images via the flickr.com uploader they all appear in the correct set automatically at the next refresh! This makes maintaining your site very easy.

www.dopiaza.org/flickr/

Gmail is da bomb

Posted in Tech Tips and Comments, Web Tech on November 3, 2007 by ionclad

I signed up to my first web-based email service a few months ago, that is, one that was actually going to use in my daily life.  I wanted something that wasn’t tied to my email server.  I was missing emails or getting them with much delay simply because my mac-based email server was in the basement and my laptop where I work a good portion of the day is not.  The Mac works very well, and it’s nice to be able to download and store stuff that people send you.  Being a user of email since the mid 90’s it’s perhaps important to note that now there seems to be little reason to stick with the traditional POP account where downloading occurs, except, if you wish to have files locally available for backup.  Or perhaps if the end of the world comes and you wish to read your emails one last time before your power also goes out.

I signed up to gmail thinking it would be a good alternate or ‘junk’ mail stop.  To my surprise I find myself using it exclusively.  I have a few workstations, a couple laptops and a whole world of online PCs that I could not read my email from.  To suddenly have complete access to email from any workstation without using pathetically unstable software to download my email (outlook) was a complete revelation.   My old ways were transformed.

The only negative I can see to gmail is it’s inability to actually organize your inbox.  You can create ‘categories’ and show only those categories, but when in your inbox everything that has not been deleted is there in a big everlasting stream, much like a blog.  I suppose blog format, a stream of chronological data is the new paradigm for data management.  I’m getting used to it, but I guess I’m still a hierarchical dude at heart.   Science fiction has been touting the idea of a central data link where all users don’t actually have local data but log in and access data live over a network link.  This model seems to be what is actually occurring in data sharing.  Freaky.

The original idea to write this post was because I just checked my email and noticed that my ‘free space’ has more then doubled since I signed up a few months ago.  Google seems to have the idea that rewarding you for continued use is a good thing. Who am I to argue.  My personal email storage capacity has grown from around 1900MB to 4631MB.  Yes, that IS over FOUR gigabytes of space… for emails!  The need to have a dedicated home based email system is evaporating, if not completely gone.

On the other hand, if you decide later to move back to a POP server model you can use this with gmail!  There seems to be very little in the ‘downside’ department.

the converted.